Michael -

> Anon:

> Not quite the line we take here. I've posted
> a few times debunking this "myth"
> or at least showing how people go astray in
> their pursuit of "do what you
> love."

- Granted (though I missed your posts on the subject, I'll search for them).

> For instance...
> You don't want to do a mag. Good... a mag is
> not what you love, is it? Nor is taking
> photos, right? Nor is designing websites,
> correct?

> And while those thing might contain images
> of this thing you love... they intrinsically
> are not what you love.

> Which leads to the question... what actually
> do you love?
> You say "beautiful women" but that
> is not specific enough.

- I suppose I was trying to be a bit less crude than the board would allow. How about - Pursuing women? How about clandestine affairs? How about romantic adventures? Kinda' the bridge between what women like in those silly romance novels and what guys envision in their p*rnographic "Penthouse Forum" fantasies.

Does this make more sense now?

> What about them do you love? Do you just
> love the fact they exist? Do you like
> looking at them? If so, where (under what
> circumstances - in the mall, walking down
> the street, etc.), in or out of clothes,

- Preferably out.

> natural or professional, blond, brunette,
> red hair, etc., etc. Real life. Film. Do you
> like talking to them?

- All of the above in various settings and encounters. Ya' see, good looking women, to the male - according to neuroscientists - trigger neurons in the same brain wave pattern that a good meal does. So my answer (taking this into account) to your question is simple - do you eat the same meal every day?

> Get it?

- Yes but again...

> What aspect of the entire "beautiful
> women" arena do you like (love)?

- see the above.

> Want to be truly honest? Stop apologising
> for things you aren't sorry about. If you
> were truly sorry or even doubtful of your
> post you would not have posted it, would
> you?

- Ahhh now Michael - all due respect sir, here's where you've got me wrong. I apologized to the WOMEN on this board for being crude. Some - many in fact - could easily find my post offensive. One cannot please everybody and for those that are more "old school" I apologized to them as they may not have come to this forum to hear such things. I stand by it.

> It would also be good to cease trying to
> justifying your post by trying to lump all
> men into a single mold. All men are not
> alike. Some are downright pathetic scumbags
> who should be locked up for the vile sexual
> things they do. Others have higher morals
> and don't let sex run their entire life -
> they view sex as a natural bodily function
> with which it is to be shared with someone
> special.

- Once again, dear sir, I have to take issue ... I think you (or those that you speak of anyway) are in the minority on this. For instance, I have high morals and I believe it's got nothing to do with my sex drive and my craving for what I truly enjoy most.

> YOU might be a perv (or whatever you label
> yourself as), but not every guy under forty
> is like you. Got it?

The perv comment was mostly tongue-in-cheek ...but for me to be honest about this AND pointing out my belief that most men feel the same way is not wrong (and I WAS being honest) - and again I stand behind it. But please don't let this disagreement change the subject - you've made some good points and I've always looked forward to your posts on this forum.

Anon.