Here's the struggle/INNER dialog (that men go through -- and I think women do NOT go through this same struggle)...

The 'problem' of 'the visual'... "If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

A large part of a man's brain produces NOTHING but that ONE simple mantra -- and there's nothing he can do about it.

Again -- here it is... "If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

Then comes... The problem of guilt... "If something as TRIVIAL and SUPERFICIAL as that (how a woman LOOKS (only)) is as powerful and important to me (in ways I can't control or understand), then I must be a complete CAD!"

This is NOT the same as a Harlequin novel (if it WERE the same, men would read Harlequin novels -- and they DON'T!). A romance novel eventaully reaches the same 'conclusion,' but the PATH it takes to get there is very, very different. One difference is... THERE IS A PATH! Thousands of words are taken up as the PATH.

Again, I have just given you the "path" that takes place in men's minds -- here (again) is the complete "path"...

"If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

You have just learned the *complete* "path" men have in their minds. You may notice a lack of nuance or romance -- or even words.

Yes, in terms of sexuality, men are no more complicated than this...

"If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

Now, LOVE is more complicated than that -- for men too.

But sex? Nope. For men, sexual attraction can reliably be summed up as...

"If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

And no, I do not believe women must struggle with this same inner dialog every second of the day, as men do.

The difference is the SIMPLICITY + the VISUAL aspect.

That's why **** appeals to men + not to women (generally).

**** is simple + visual -- and it fits in with the simple inner mantra...

"If you look like [certain body shape], I want to **** you, RIGHT NOW."

PS: the flip side of that is... "If you do NOT look like [certain body shape], I do NOT want to [etc.]" I had this discussion with a friend (female) who has two teenage daughters who are overweight. She was trying to tell them weight doesn't really matter -- it's what's inside that counts, blah, blah, blah.
I told her she was lying to her daughters, and I was sure they KNEW it. Women who do not fit into our society's VERY NARROW idea of what the 'proper' body shape is (to be sexually attractive) ARE at a disadvantage (in terms of being sexually attractive to men). That's just the truth. Men *DO* objectify women -- the visual *IS* of utmost importance to them. THAT'S the point of that info product. The point is, "Your husband's NOT a pervert." (not YOUR husband, Sandi -- I mean that radio guy's point is wives (in general) shouldn't think of their husbands as being 'perverts' because they thrive on VISUAL (only) attraction -- such as ****, women passing on the street, etc.

Now, you say, well that's all CULTURALLY INDUCED. To which I say -- YES! It is all culturally induced! -- So is using a knife + fork to eat, using toilet paper, and eating cows instead of dogs. What is considered sexually attractive is ***ALWAYS*** culturally induced!!! In the 60's M. Monroe was a sex symbol -- today she would be considered a 'fat chick.'