View Single Post
  #4  
Old September 11, 2006, 04:35 AM
MichaelRoss
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "For Fear Of . . . "

Sandy,

Thanks for expressing your support.

This is an "I disagree wholeheartedly" moment for me. For Where do we draw the line with your line of thought?...

"Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to anorexia or bulimia, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move."

Let's ban All cars because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend in a car crash, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

Let's ban All swimming pools because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to drowning, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move. In fact, lets ban swimming for the same reason.

Let's ban ALL fast food outlets because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to obesity, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

Let's ban hiking because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to being lost in the wilds, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

Let's ban all alcohol because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to alcoholism, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

Let's ban all TV because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to poor blood circulation caused by sitting in front of the idiot box, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

Let's ban all walking outside because Anyone who has ever lost a loved one or friend to hit and run, will undoubtedly cheer this forward-thinking move.

And so on and so forth, ad infinitum.

What's next... we all must watch the two minute physical jerks - as so aptly called in the book 1984 - because of so-called forward-thinking from the govt?

No thanks. I'll have no part of your govt-controlled "forward-thinking".

Michael Ross
Reply With Quote