![]() |
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That "Big Brother", who you seem to love, ain't all you crack it up to be!
Gary > "You failed to mention the > congressional hearings a couple years ago > where the IRS was called to task on their > strong arm tactics involving taxpayers. > Seems I remember congress told them they had > better shape up." > ******That's an interesting statement, Gary. > What does that have to do with whether or > not the man in the story actively tried to > comply with our existing laws and protect > his company? After seeing your response, I > went back and re-read the original story and > nowhere does it mention what actions the man > took in order to prevent the problem? > Nowhere in the original story is it stated > the government gave the man misinformation. > The point of the story seemed to be > the-government-is-out-to-screw-us and my > response was > the-government-doesn't-screw-us-as-much-as-we-screw-ourselves-so-exercise-your-legal-right-to-be-informed-and-do-your-homework-in-order-to-protect-yourself-and-your-business. > (Geez, it's hard to type a hyphen between > every word!!!) > Our principles of government and the actual > government worker bees and law makers aren't > perfect. You'll get no argument from me on > that one! :) But they can hardly be deemed > responsible for the choices WE make. Like I > said before, the government can't compel > someone to seek information. If the > government were given that right, we'd be > whining about how they've taken away our > freedom to be stupid and uneducated. Also, > the government shouldn't be held responsible > when someone **insists** on making > bad/stupid decisions especially when that > someone could have done a little bit of > research and made much better decisions. > It's really very simple; we have > laws/rules/procedures we must follow to be > in compliance with the Law/reap the benefits > of the Law. When we aren't in compliance > with the Law because we failed to find out > what the Law is, (and let's face it, how > many business owners AREN'T aware we have > laws regarding taxing businesses???) WE > failed, not the government. On a similar > note, when we don't find out what the Law is > and we miss out on taking advantage of the > many benefits which could be available to > us, which are granted to us by Law, WE > failed, not the government. > Now, if it turns out the man in the story > exercised due diligence and sought > information from his favorite tax paid > public servants and they gave him > misinformation THEN the government should be > held responsible for the man making a bad > decision regarding taxation of workers. > But so far, I haven't seen anything in the > story to suggest the government did anything > wrong in that particular situation. Of > course, I left my secret decoder ring at > home so maybe I'm missing an invisible > message...... ;) > :) > EM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person