Dien Rice
May 3, 2018, 09:13 AM
Hi Glenn,
You're right, all of Roger Corman's movies were in profit (except for one, as you said)!
He knew what audiences wanted... And gave it to them... while cutting costs to the bone!
And they weren't all low budget trash...
For example, the original "Little Shop of Horrors" movie was a low-budget Roger Corman film... (The one from 1960, not from 1986, which was a remake...)
A lot of interesting lessons there... :)
Best wishes,
Dien
Thanks Gordon,
I did a study of Roger Corman and his "Shlock" Movie Niche. I Study the BEST of The BEST and Roger is The BEST at making NO-RISK Munny Making with movies there Ever Was.
He made 7 movies a year - More than 400!
Which NICHE - all other Movie Makers Have now STOLEN -
Because THEY TOO Noticed
Roger Never - Ever Lost money on a movie.
...
You're right, all of Roger Corman's movies were in profit (except for one, as you said)!
He knew what audiences wanted... And gave it to them... while cutting costs to the bone!
And they weren't all low budget trash...
For example, the original "Little Shop of Horrors" movie was a low-budget Roger Corman film... (The one from 1960, not from 1986, which was a remake...)
A lot of interesting lessons there... :)
Best wishes,
Dien
Thanks Gordon,
I did a study of Roger Corman and his "Shlock" Movie Niche. I Study the BEST of The BEST and Roger is The BEST at making NO-RISK Munny Making with movies there Ever Was.
He made 7 movies a year - More than 400!
Which NICHE - all other Movie Makers Have now STOLEN -
Because THEY TOO Noticed
Roger Never - Ever Lost money on a movie.
...
