ImpactYourArea.com
October 4, 2006, 08:44 AM
I find it somewhat amusing that you are defending online marketing, but are pushing an offline method (mugs). ;-)
So TW,
It looks like a created a paradox.
I'm glad I made you laugh. It's good to laugh.
Clearly understand, I will defend ALL MARKETING, whether online or off.
After 15 years of having an online business and 2 offline businesses, I have learned that, offline marketing is not better than online marketing, and neither is one more effective than the other. That's not my opinion, it's just been my experience.
But if we're talking cost, online advertising is cheaper than offline.
From the Trouse
Woody Quiñones
ImpactYourArea.com (http://www.ImpactYourArea.com)
So TW,
It looks like a created a paradox.
I'm glad I made you laugh. It's good to laugh.
Clearly understand, I will defend ALL MARKETING, whether online or off.
After 15 years of having an online business and 2 offline businesses, I have learned that, offline marketing is not better than online marketing, and neither is one more effective than the other. That's not my opinion, it's just been my experience.
But if we're talking cost, online advertising is cheaper than offline.
From the Trouse
Woody Quiñones
ImpactYourArea.com (http://www.ImpactYourArea.com)
