Sandi Bowman
June 21, 2007, 05:16 PM
I believe I mentioned in my post that it was 'for charity', Phil.
I guess the thing that really set me off was NOT John Reese's invitation, which he handled very discreetly and with appropriate disclaimers, but one of the others that had numerous pictures of the 'bunny' gals and so on (and no warnings prior to access). Some were quite inappropriate to have been sent to homes where young children could see them. Since it was a requested list mailing it would not have been caught by filters. I unsubscribed from that one because he obviously lacked common sense and consideration.
Anyway....for what it's worth...charity or fundraiser makes no difference, my basic objection still stands.
Sandi Bowman
I guess the thing that really set me off was NOT John Reese's invitation, which he handled very discreetly and with appropriate disclaimers, but one of the others that had numerous pictures of the 'bunny' gals and so on (and no warnings prior to access). Some were quite inappropriate to have been sent to homes where young children could see them. Since it was a requested list mailing it would not have been caught by filters. I unsubscribed from that one because he obviously lacked common sense and consideration.
Anyway....for what it's worth...charity or fundraiser makes no difference, my basic objection still stands.
Sandi Bowman
