A fascinating discussion between Scott Adams and Stefan Molyneux

[GordonJ]

You guy's are making excuses for Trump's lack of performance. He couldn't control his ego and was playing defense instead of asking Hillary to explain all of the things that the media failed to ask. Like illegal immigration, Bimbo eruptions, Benghazi, destroying her emails after she was ordered to turn them over... law and order and on and on and on.... I guess Trump wanted to hold back in a useless attempt to win over non-existent undecided voters and how the Democrats rigged the system in many States by allowing people to vote who are not even American Citizen's. He needs to stick to the issues and every time HC attempts to drag him into the mud he needs to not go into defensive mode. The mud is the only place Hillary can win. She can't win by sticking to the issues. Trump needs to hit her hard and dodge any questions she fires back at him and keep her explaining her position on the issues. When he asks about the things the media won't ask her about you will see her dodge him with well rehearsed lines and she will bait Trump, hoping he doesn't learn how to dodge and fire back a good question at her. In sales... he who asks the questions controls the conversation. Then he needs to ask a closing question to the American public and shut up and wait for their response.

For all his expertise, he is quickly persuaded. First he supported Hillary, then
Trump...no, now Johnson...

He must be selling a lot of books, he jumps ship I guess when the book sales begin to plummet.

For all his insightful analysis of the persuasion taking place, perhaps he should turn that light on himself.

He is, another marketer, cashing in, which is a good thing. His election expertise, however, is questionable.

Gordon