Hi Rick,

Thinking about the whole "book experience", I think your response is a standard one. Its only _after_ reading the book that the front image may make more sense. If I could make you instantly
grok the concepts of remote hypnosis in one cover picture, you wouldnt need to read the book, and I would be Super-Gordon.

And last time I looked, Im not :)

Today i found a picture of one of the '2001: a space odity' book covers, and had an illustrative epiphany quite similar to this present discussion.
...Monoliths, babies, kubrick : what ? ? ?

I do think thoughtforms can be transmitted using media other than alphabetic or phonetic representations, but such communication involves more complex mechanisms than we curently understand or have a vocabulary to describe. Maybe a quantum physicist could shed more light on the matter. . .

steve '' birch

> I'm not knocking what you've done. It's a
> nice cover. But to be honest, I would have
> never gotten all that if you hadn't
> explained it. Assuming I'm a member of the
> target market, (and I'm pretty sure I am
> *g*), will others have trouble drawing out
> all that information as well?