Gordon of plaguarism.....I was looking for the hitch that Taylor spoke of - the thing we all missed. So I just took a wild guess and wondered if that was it. Not that Gordon was going to literally plaguarize someone!

Taylor said, and I quote, "I can assure you ALL that we failed to read the entire letter..... because of all the excitement the letter caused each of us emotionally we totally missed something most pertinent. "

So it seems as if we are all missing something here and Gordon is waiting to see if somebody figures it out.

I think!

Anya.

> . . . and presented in his words, doesn't
> that make it his? I don't mean cosmetic
> rearrangements of information. That's
> plagiarism.

> But the genuine presentation of what one has
> learned, in ones OWN words, and in light of
> one's OWN experiences - well,

> Shoot. I'd have to have 10 to 12 pages of
> footnotes for every time I've expressed a
> concept I embrace, or belief I've come to
> hold.

> 'Sides. This is Gordon. He's learned
> no-LEARNED- from all those folks. You can be
> sure his unique approach to WHATEVER he's
> learned will constitute NEW learning.

> One more thing. Even if it's only (did I say
> that?) presentation of the actual words of
> the masters, he'll most likely have gotten
> clearance.

> More importantly, he'll have found the
> kernel of truth that WE miss when we read
> these same folks' stuff.

> Mary