![]() |
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was publishing a paper and ink newsletter dealing with mail-order/network marketing ideas and promotion. I was doing it all. Writing, typesetting, layout, photocopying, folding, addressing, and licking the stamps. I was sending out about 200 newsletters/month.
Then I got the bright idea of selling subscriptions to the newsletter (it was free up until then). I developed a multi-level pay plan based on a $30/six month subscription. (It eventually went to $129/year.) I invested over $1,000 in a 386 computer (this was 1993) and another $1,000 in specialized MLM software to track the levels, calculate commissions, print checks, etc. I was off and running...just me and my computer. To make a long story short, I was doing most of the dirty work, and getting the short end of the stick. I was paying out a total of 75% of subscription monies in commissions. (There was very little "breakage" money left over...most of the 75% actually went out the door in commission checks.) After printing costs and postage, there was very little left for my labor of love. Although I did make a little from subscribers who joined some of the mlm programs in my downline at the time, the effort was hardly worth it. Had I known then what I know now, I may have been able to capitalize on back-end products. Hindsight is always 20-20. If I had those same 400+ subscribers paying me $100/year for an ezine (practically no out of pocket cost) I would be a happy camper. If I had had people to help me write, type, fold, and lick stamps back then, I would have been glad to share the wealth. How many associate programs on the net today are paying out 75%?! So, yes, Gordon...if there is a way to share the work for an equitable share of the wealth, this could be a good thing. JDB Seven Secrets of Self-made Millionaires...free ebook download. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I would certainly be intersted in hearing more... Sounds like a superb idea :-)
> I was publishing a paper and ink newsletter > dealing with mail-order/network marketing > ideas and promotion. I was doing it all. > Writing, typesetting, layout, photocopying, > folding, addressing, and licking the stamps. > I was sending out about 200 > newsletters/month. > Then I got the bright idea of selling > subscriptions to the newsletter (it was free > up until then). I developed a multi-level > pay plan based on a $30/six month > subscription. (It eventually went to > $129/year.) I invested over $1,000 in a 386 > computer (this was 1993) and another $1,000 > in specialized MLM software to track the > levels, calculate commissions, print checks, > etc. I was off and running...just me and my > computer. > To make a long story short, I was doing most > of the dirty work, and getting the short end > of the stick. I was paying out a total of > 75% of subscription monies in commissions. > (There was very little "breakage" > money left over...most of the 75% actually > went out the door in commission checks.) > After printing costs and postage, there was > very little left for my labor of love. > Although I did make a little from > subscribers who joined some of the mlm > programs in my downline at the time, the > effort was hardly worth it. Had I known then > what I know now, I may have been able to > capitalize on back-end products. Hindsight > is always 20-20. If I had those same 400+ > subscribers paying me $100/year for an ezine > (practically no out of pocket cost) I would > be a happy camper. > If I had had people to help me write, type, > fold, and lick stamps back then, I would > have been glad to share the wealth. How many > associate programs on the net today are > paying out 75%?! > So, yes, Gordon...if there is a way to share > the work for an equitable share of the > wealth, this could be a good thing. > JDB Personal Development 24/7! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person