SOWPub Small Business Forums  
 

Click Here to see the latest posts!

Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life
or share your success stories (and educational "failures")...

Sign up for the Hidden Business Ideas Letter Free edition, and receive a free report straight to your inbox: "Idea that works in a pandemic: Ordinary housewife makes $50,000 a month in her spare time, using a simple idea - and her driveway..."

NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Also, please no insults or personal attacks.
Feel free to link to your web site though at the end of your posts.

Stay up to date! Get email notifications or
get "new thread" feeds here

 

Go Back   SOWPub Small Business Forums > Main Category > Original SOWPub Forum Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old August 13, 2003, 02:26 AM
Michael Ross (Aust, Qld)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Three sides to every card

> As a discerning consumer, you'd then have a
> choice between possible infringement of your
> privacy rights and lower costs. I think
> providing people with such a choice is not
> in and of itself a bad thing.

But that's just it... if these tags are everywhere, there is NO CHOICE.

You can "spin" the good side of it all you want. Fact is.. stock control with tags can easily be done with tags on boxes of goods. The individual product items do NOT need a RFID Tag.

> So does that mean we should stop any new
> technology, on the chance it is abused?

Does that mean we should accept all things thrown at us because someone can spin some good out of it... even if there is a serious detrimental side?

> But just to reiterate, my main point is that
> there can be some benefits from such
> technologies. From the most part I'm a
> supporter of widespread privacy rights, but
> I think slamming a new technology on privacy
> concerns without raising possible benefits
> presents only one side of the story.

For the most part you are a supporter of privacy rights? For the most part?

What parts aren't you in support of?

> Provided this is a choice and not a
> requirement, I don't see why that would be a
> bad thing.

Again... with these types of tags there is no choice.

I can see a whole RFID-free products black market evolve if this becomes widespread.

Some people already go to the
> extent of labelling their more expensive
> items in case they are stolen.

So? Other people don't, do they? Just because some people do something is no reason to implement a widespread policy.

There are loads of people who decide it is in their best interest to borrow money like mad and go into vast amounts of personal debt... should we all do the same because they do it?

See the point? Just because others do something is no reason to do something. That arguement is the sort a small child puts forth.

And sacrificing privacy to MAYBE save a few bucks is a weak reason to sacrifice privacy.

Michael Ross
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Other recent posts on the forum...


Seeds of Wisdom Publishing (front page) | Seeds of Wisdom Business forum | Seeds of Wisdom Original Business Forum (Archive) | Hidden Unusual Business Ideas Newsletter | Hotsheet Profits | Persuade via Remote Influence | Affia Band | The Entrepreneur's Hotsheet | The SeedZine (Entrepreneurial Ezine)

Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.