Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
To clarify - I wasn't accusing
Gordon of plaguarism.....I was looking for the hitch that Taylor spoke of - the thing we all missed. So I just took a wild guess and wondered if that was it. Not that Gordon was going to literally plaguarize someone!
Taylor said, and I quote, "I can assure you ALL that we failed to read the entire letter..... because of all the excitement the letter caused each of us emotionally we totally missed something most pertinent. " So it seems as if we are all missing something here and Gordon is waiting to see if somebody figures it out. I think! Anya. > . . . and presented in his words, doesn't > that make it his? I don't mean cosmetic > rearrangements of information. That's > plagiarism. > But the genuine presentation of what one has > learned, in ones OWN words, and in light of > one's OWN experiences - well, > Shoot. I'd have to have 10 to 12 pages of > footnotes for every time I've expressed a > concept I embrace, or belief I've come to > hold. > 'Sides. This is Gordon. He's learned > no-LEARNED- from all those folks. You can be > sure his unique approach to WHATEVER he's > learned will constitute NEW learning. > One more thing. Even if it's only (did I say > that?) presentation of the actual words of > the masters, he'll most likely have gotten > clearance. > More importantly, he'll have found the > kernel of truth that WE miss when we read > these same folks' stuff. > Mary |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person