![]() |
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dno
> Boyd's post about Lindows doesn't mention > anything about the OS (operating System) > used to power Lindows. It is Linux, not > Windows. LindowsOS is under a family-use > licence so you can install it, and the > different applications on every computer in > your home (at no additional cost)...whereas > with MS WindowsXP you will have to purchase > a different copy for every computer you own. > Not only is this expensive and frustrating > it is going to KILL Windows on a lot of > desktops. And those who decide to use > LINDOWS might be interested in knowing that > they support Netscape and Mozzila, not the > Microsoft Browser. Lindows does offer > partial support for Microsoft Office > programs but they fully support the " > Open Office " which you are going to > see become a lot more popular over the next > couple of years. It is a fact that over 20% > of the offices using Windows based servers > and products are not going to be able to > afford the new Microsoft's licensing > program . This makes Open Office a lot more > attractive. > Linux is getting a lot more power behind. > Especially from the likes of IBM. IBM logo > xSeries servers offer a reliable foundation > for leading Linux-based computing, providing > outstanding performance, reliability and > manageability for core business > applications. IBM is working closely with > four leading Linux distributors?Caldera > International, Red Hat Inc., SuSE AG, and > TurboLinux. > You might say -- sure that's nice Steve, but > I just operate a desktop computer. Red Hat > Inc. which is one of the Linux distributors > IBM is working with is gearing up to support > Desktop users with a new program code name > "LIMBO." It is expected to become > version 8.0 of Red Hat, and is already > proving it may become a good solid > replacement for Windows. It comes bundled > with the Open Office suite, Gnome 2.0, > Mozzila 1.0 and Apache 2.0. It also has a > host of new and improved graphical system > configuration tools. You are apt to see a > greater presence for Red Hat in the desktop > computing space. > Read Adam Scheinberg's review and Update on > Red Hat's Limbo Progress and view the > screen shots he took while giving Limbo a > spin. It starting to look a lot more user > friendly for Windows users, and a lot more > cost effective. I haven't even touched on > the subject of reliability and performance > of the OS. > So besides AOL adoption of Netscape in > version 8.0 of their software, in the next > couple of years expect to see Linux coming > to a desktop near you ;-) If you're not > coding your pages (which I know many of you > don't) for BOTH browsers you will pay the > price in lost sales if potential customers > cannot use your Microsoft based website. > And for those who will FREAK OUT (hope that > term doesn't pre-date me) about having your > IE browser replaced by Netscape or Mozilla, > don't worry. The reason IE loads fast on > your computer is because it is pre-loaded > into Windows every time you boot up. Expect > the same performance for Mozzila in LIMBO. > For those of you taking a look at Mozilla > now , you may be aware that there is a > "LOADER" program for > "WIN32" users which will boot > Mozilla up faster then IE. > Also note that the Mozzila web site > features OEone HomeBase DESKTOP which is a > free operating environment for Linux, based > on Mozilla technologies. > For those of you who might think this is TOO > NEW to be concerned with. It isn't new. > Several big-name manufacturers, such as Sun > Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and > Compaq, signed up to participate in the > Gnome Foundation dating back to the summer > of 2000. The Gnome Foundation also won the > support of Linux companies Red Hat, VA Linux > Systems, Eazel, Helix Code, Henzai and > Turbolinux. The short story of it is: they > liked what they saw. > Steve -- I don't believe you or your > predictions That's fine! Years ago when > everyone was developing their websites for > Netscape 3.x they didn't develop for IE 3.x. > I told you not to discount IE. Microsoft was > producing a better browser. The browser war > heated up when version 4.x browsers were > released. This wasn't really a browser war. > It was a realization. Microsoft had already > won the war with version 3.x of their > browser. No one really paid attention to me > ;-) Now that I'm here and telling you that > Microsoft Windows and their IE browser is on > the way "out" I doubt few will > believe me. > But if you have ANY doubts, make sure your > web pages are compatible with the major > browser and that old > "whatsitsname." > Best Regards, > Steve MacLellan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person