SOWPub Small Business Forums  
 

Click Here to see the latest posts!

Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life
or share your success stories (and educational "failures")...

Sign up for the Hidden Business Ideas Letter Free edition, and receive a free report straight to your inbox: "Idea that works in a pandemic: Ordinary housewife makes $50,000 a month in her spare time, using a simple idea - and her driveway..."

NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Also, please no insults or personal attacks.
Feel free to link to your web site though at the end of your posts.

Stay up to date! Get email notifications or
get "new thread" feeds here

 

Go Back   SOWPub Small Business Forums > Main Category > Original SOWPub Forum Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old March 7, 2003, 04:37 PM
Michael Ross (Aust, Qld)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Yeah, but what about my question(s)?

I had a look at the chart. It looks interesting. And something glares out at me...

He predicted a DOW of 30,000 (roughly) for 2003. We are NOWHERE near that number. If we continued his yellow line we would be chopping off a large section of purple block. And we're not talking a slight miss like the "under-cut" near 1993. We are talking about a DOW which is near 25% of what he predicted. That is a BIG miss.

If this is all supposed to be based on "necessary family spending" than small little outside influences shouldn't matter.

And doesn't following this model show that the followee is basing their investments on price of the stock and not the underlying business - which my original question was asking about.

Sure the DOW might go down (plummet, crash and burn, whatever.) But what about the underlying companies. Some of which should be experiencing growth during this same period...

Certain medical stocks.
Certain property stocks.

Being two just examples.

I recall you even mentioning your stocks going up while the index fell.

So your experience shows certain underlying business are not effected by the index.

His model is so way off the mark it is not even funny.

And we haven't even thrown into the mix the idea that as soon as you know about something, the outcome changes because your actions change thanks to the new information.

So with your experience proving otherwise and his so totally wrong prediction, what stock/faith/reliability can we place in anything else he predicts from this point on?

Wouldn't the smarter thing be to study the stock market from the 1930s to find out which stocks did better than the rest during such a tumultuous time? Because if the economy of today is going to echo the end of the roaring 20s, doesn't it stand to reason the same companies that did well then will do well now - after all, human behavior doesn't really change.

Thoughts?

Michael Ross

I am sensing the need for a simple book to explain "Everything you need to know about the stock and bond market". Stockmarket for dummies?
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Other recent posts on the forum...


Seeds of Wisdom Publishing (front page) | Seeds of Wisdom Business forum | Seeds of Wisdom Original Business Forum (Archive) | Hidden Unusual Business Ideas Newsletter | Hotsheet Profits | Persuade via Remote Influence | Affia Band | The Entrepreneur's Hotsheet | The SeedZine (Entrepreneurial Ezine)

Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.