![]() |
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's hard to know what to post during war time.... Everyone's glued to their TV screen (me included).
Adam, in an earlier post, wrote about businesses that do well when times are bad, such as during war time. Some businesses which do well in war time are those providing information related to the military. For example, I'm thinking about the membership web site Stratfor , or a publishing company like Jane's which sells a lot of military-related information.... In the case of Stratfor, I know they picked up a lot of new subscribers during the war in Kosovo, and it was probably the same during the war in Afghanistan, and in the present war. Although I don't have any sure way of knowing, I would expect Jane's probably sees the same kind of trends. During war time, there's an insatiable hunger for more of this kind of information.... No matter what the circumstance, there is some kind of business which is catering to the needs of the time. Even during apparently "bad" business times, such as during war time.... Just thought some might find that interesting.... - Dien Rice |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dno
> It's hard to know what to post during war > time.... Everyone's glued to their TV screen > (me included). > Adam, in an earlier post, wrote about > businesses that do well when times are bad, > such as during war time. Some businesses > which do well in war time are those > providing information related to the > military. For example, I'm thinking about > the membership web site Stratfor , or a > publishing company like Jane's which sells > a lot of military-related information.... > In the case of Stratfor, I know they picked > up a lot of new subscribers during the war > in Kosovo, and it was probably the same > during the war in Afghanistan, and in the > present war. Although I don't have any sure > way of knowing, I would expect Jane's > probably sees the same kind of trends. > During war time, there's an insatiable > hunger for more of this kind of > information.... > No matter what the circumstance, there is > some kind of business which is catering to > the needs of the time. Even during > apparently "bad" business times, > such as during war time.... > Just thought some might find that > interesting.... > - Dien Rice |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Boyd:
My pay TV provider only provides a few choices for news - Sky, CNN, BBC, CNBC (MSNBC), Bloomberg. As each tends to go off on tangents at times I flick between them. That's as far as TV news goes. I also check the wires and underground news (Freep). Michael Ross |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Boyd,
I get the same news channels as Michael, I tend to switch between CNN, BBC, and Fox, though lately I seem to be watching CNN most of the time.... I tend to like CNN's "military analysis" with Gen. Wesley Clark (Ret.). Fox's "analysis" seems a bit too "hypey" for me. - Dien |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The hype you hear is music to my ears after all the "Un-biased" diatribes of the main-stream news journalists and hollywood media millionaires from Mike Farrell, Jeannine Garofolo, Kiefer, Martin Sheen, Barbara, Baldwin's, yadda, yadda, yadda, ad nauseum that get so much air time in the US.
How un-biased can they be when 90% admit voting for BC. At least 9/11 and the necessary response didn't occur during his watch. It was bad enough watching his lack of concern with the soldiers and sailors who died during his Presidency. Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, and the terrorist attack on the US Cole couldn't motivate him to action. It's no wonder OSB felt we were weak and deserving of his assault on the towers. JMO! Dennis Bevers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Dennis,
I was just talking about the military strategic analysis part of it, that's all. That's the only real part I'm interested in. As far as I'm concerned, the rest is more or less the same - same images, etc. - Dien |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I understand. I haven't been able to listen/watch the reporters on the sideline asking dumb, stooopid, idiotic questions of classified nature expecting the office to share secret info with someone who might actually broadcast it to our enemies, back during Desert Shield/Desert Storm of '91.
Instead of the constant re-telling of the activity from the Middle East, I just listened to my big band music between sales calls today. Thanks for letting me get that off my chest. I've had it up to my baldspot with all the reporting on the latest barf from one Dixie Chick in Europe to hollywood star visiting Irag and finding no evil there. Which brings up the question - Where were all these non-existent Scud missiles Saddam didn't have or had supposedly destroyed? I appreciate the forum here and even hesitated before posting that response. You have my blessing to delete it, not that you need my OK. Dennis Bevers Bi-level marketing business for b2b sales. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BOYD!
How delightful to "hear" from you. I have been favoring NBC mostly because I appreciate the teaming of Matt Lauer and Katie Couric. I end up continuing to watch them and the News Team that supports them. I was watching when all those cruise missiles landed yesterday, it was chilling to hear one of the journalists get jarred by the action unfolding so close to him it was palpable and his responses were palpable. I found myself logging into MSNBC.com last night to catch up on news, also, after being dissatisfied with CNN.com. I don't stay in front of the television much because they repeat so much of the same stuff over and over again (I mean how many times can I hear they are almost positive and about sure that it may have been Sadaam or a body double and what was up with those funky glasses? over and over and over.) What about you, Boyd, where are you getting your information? With Gratitude, Julie Committed to Creating Heaven on Earth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At least with Fox you get SOME opinions from Conservatives.
You don't with the 3 "Majors" and especially you get a ONE-sided, Lefty View from the "Clinton News Network"...aka the "Commie News Network". Don Alm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi,
> How delightful to "hear" from you. Thank you very much for that. I've really been down lately and hearing kind words does me a lot of good. > What about you, Boyd, where are you getting > your information? I read a lot of discussion groups and try to get a sense of the truth. Whenever (usually) I get an "Oh, I see" moment I pop over here to Dien's board and post a message. Which is probably not very smart of me since I don't get anything from it and it could give my enemies amunition to use against me. Thank you again, - Boyd |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person