SOWPub Small Business Forums  
 

Click Here to see the latest posts!

Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life
or share your success stories (and educational "failures")...

Sign up for the Hidden Business Ideas Letter Free edition, and receive a free report straight to your inbox: "Idea that works in a pandemic: Ordinary housewife makes $50,000 a month in her spare time, using a simple idea - and her driveway..."

NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Also, please no insults or personal attacks.
Feel free to link to your web site though at the end of your posts.

Stay up to date! Get email notifications or
get "new thread" feeds here

 

Go Back   SOWPub Small Business Forums > Main Category > Original SOWPub Forum Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old August 10, 2003, 05:04 AM
Michael Ross (Aust, Qld)
 
Posts: n/a
Default It's all about context

Tom:

My post was written as a response - an answer - to a question which was asked. Everything in it must be read with that context in mind. Okay?

Now let me address some of your points...

70% real estate ownership in Australia...

First, this number is actually a number which combines those who OWN with those who are PAYING OFF. It has been this way for something like 50 years.

Please don't confuse this - owning or paying off a house - with investing in real estate to make money. 70% of the people in Australia do not own investment property. If 30% of the people rent, and something like 90% of people with investment proprety only own one investment property, you cannot come up with 70% of the people owning investment property.

If we accept your number that 40% own shares... and shares are viewed as investment (after all, you cannot live in shares), then percentage wise, more people own shares as investments than own property as investments.

As for the other items... again. My post is to be read in the context of it answering a question.

Landlord vs Stock Investor could be a reason. Is it? Who knows? I'm sure there is someone somewhere who feels that way.

Fixing toilets. I was refering to the statement made by the likes of Robert Kiyosaki who say people tell him they don't want to invest in real estate because they don't like fixing toilets, and Robert tells them he doesn't either so hires a property manager. Again. You need to read my post within the context it was written.

My mention of the Creative RE techniques finished with instant gratification. Not instant wealth. There is a difference. Bank red tape and all those other things delay gratification.

Some banks may lend 100% of the value of the property when you play funny games with the sales prices and the like... but only the stock market allows you to invest ten times the amount of money you have. - Which means a loss will see you totally in the hole.

"Real Estate has always been the easiest way for the average person to create substantial wealth"

Agreed!

Michael Ross

P.S. Where abouts in Sydney are you based?
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Other recent posts on the forum...


Seeds of Wisdom Publishing (front page) | Seeds of Wisdom Business forum | Seeds of Wisdom Original Business Forum (Archive) | Hidden Unusual Business Ideas Newsletter | Hotsheet Profits | Persuade via Remote Influence | Affia Band | The Entrepreneur's Hotsheet | The SeedZine (Entrepreneurial Ezine)

Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.