Flash Websites ...

> Hi, what is your opinion on Flash websites
> vs. pure HTML websites ?

Keep it simple. And that means AVOID flash or any other unnecessary elements.

A recent example of a flash website was the one Boyd linked to. I left a follow up post stating I could NOT use that site in any way because it depended on flash. And I don't allow "plug-ins" to run without my permission. I am not going to run a plug-in just to view a site.

Forcing a visiter to download something to view your site is bad. Too much hassle.

Flash sites are
> very advanced now, as you know. They
> download fast, and the home page contains
> pure HTML and text so that search engine
> spiders can index pages.

A page can only download as fast as the slowest connection in the route the packets travel to your computer. If all routers are 56k (for example) and you're using a 14k modem, your download will be VERY slow.

The home pages also
> have a button where you can skip the flash
> intro etc.

Now that is asking me to take further action just to view a site. The more choices I am forced to take just to view the stuff I want, the more I am likely to depart.

> I have always heard that Flash home pages or
> sites were bad because someone who visits
> your site wants "information now"
> and does not want to wait for anything.

True. Even a large graphic is enough to make many people hit the back button.

> Perhaps this is changing considering how
> advanced everything is getting.

In a perfect world where everyone has cable modems or satellite internet, the developers will give even less consideration to fast loading and will go stupid with the page sizes. And even IF loading is fast there are still people who do NOT want to be forced to download something to view a site.

> I'm re-doing a couple of my sites and that
> is why I am asking for your expert opinions.
> Flash sites look very professional and can
> offer audio links on the home page and more.

HTML can also offer audio links. HTML sites also look professional.

> My thinking is that these type of sites may
> be become more popular as time goes by
> because they look so good, the intros and
> music are often very embracing, and because
> people may be getting tired of the same old
> type of information only sites (eg. Just
> text and maybe some pictures).

MUSIC? You play music to me and I am outta there. Let me be the one to start the music or whatever. But do NOT force it upon me.

Having said all this... you really need to consult with your target market.

If your site is an information site, then keep it simple. Avoid flash and other objects that require the plug-ins to run, or require someone to download something to view your site.

Michael Ross


Keeping It Simple