![]() |
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
|
SOWPub Business Forum Seeds of Wisdom Forum |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks TW.
I recently read this article: Quote:
And yet I'm going to try... Sigh! Google vs Facebook. Facebook recently overtook Google and became the most popular website on the interwebs. But it still makes nowhere near as much $$ as Google does. More traffic. Fewer transactions. Don't know what it does with your basic truism. But balance sheets like those don't lie. Quote:
Anyways... The argument shouldn't be about where the ad or the transaction originates from. Or even whether the ad is intrusive* or not. But just on whether the ad / marketing is effective for You or not. * You can be intrusive and interrupt folks to win their attention. Or you could be unique and win their attention. Like this footnote shows, you don't necessary have to be loud or in-your-face to make an impact. After all - this is the most closely scrutinized paragraph of this entire thread - and all because of its small different font size and the usage of asterisk. Your marketing differs a lot on whether you're producing a movie or running a plumbing business. Before you even create an ad, you need to know things like how do people make decisions to consume what you provide. How often they require your services. Do they ever know when they require your help? Or do you have to educate them? Based on that - you decide if you should take a passive brand building approach and build a reputation. Or if you should actively take a direct marketing approach. Or more likely - if you should use a mix of both. Last edited by Ankesh : July 14, 2010 at 06:20 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person