![]() |
|
Click Here to see the latest posts! Ask any questions related to business / entrepreneurship / money-making / life NO BLATANT ADS PLEASE
Stay up to date! Get email notifications or |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dien, as a fan of Mr. Buffet.. and reader of several books on him I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post.. Thanks, Josh Hinds :-)
> As a youngster, Warren Buffett was always > interested in how to make money. > When he was a teenager, he bought some > pinball machines. He figured that a good > place to put these pinball machines was in > barber shops, since kids who were waiting > around for a haircut could play some pinball > while they waited. He came to an equitable > arrangement with the barbers -- they split > the profits evenly. Every week, all he had > to do was go around to his various pinball > machines and collect his money. > As he became a young man with a wife and > started a family, he wanted to find security > for his family, so his urge to become > wealthy increased. He had studied finance > under a man named Benjamin Graham. Graham > had written the classic textbook > "Security Analysis," where he > explained a whole new way of evaluating > stocks based on identifying and buying > undervalued stocks. > The problem with this was that Graham's > method blatantly said that the stock market > was not an "efficient market." > This flew in the face of the theories of the > economists of his day, and of today's > economists too. It led to a fierce > intellectual conflict between these two > schools of thought. > Warren Buffett stepped into this maelstrom. > To this day he believes that the > "efficient market hypothesis" is > wrong -- that is, you can find exceptions > where the market is NOT efficient. It is > WHERE the theory is wrong that Warren Buffet > has made all his money. > What is the efficient market hypothesis? It > assumes that the stock market is an > "efficient market" where there's > perfect knowledge of what's going on, and > that knowledge is applied in a purely > rational way. So any new information should > immediately be factored into the stock > price. > The efficient market hypothesis says that if > a stock is trading at $252 per share, it > really is WORTH $252 a share at that time. > However, if a few months later it only > trades at $6 a share, then at that later > time it is really WORTH $6 a share -- > EVEN IF THE FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE > BUSINESS HAVE NOT CHANGED . > Warren Buffett's criticisms of the > "efficient market hypothesis" is > that people are not fully logical creatures, > but they are in fact highly emotional. > People do NOT make unemotional calculations > of stock prices, but they are in general > highly affected by the daily EMOTIONAL > effects of the behavior of others in the > stock market. If everyone else is buying, > people feel more secure to buy as well. But > if everyone else is selling, people also > have a tendency to want to sell. This is an > emotional reaction -- not one always based > on logic. > By using this knowledge, Warren Buffett was > able to bring a purely logical approach to > stock market investing, which takes > advantage of the emotional behavior of most > others in the stock market. When the stock > prices go too low (due to emotional > reasons), Buffett will buy. Then, when they > shoot up too high (again due to emotional > reasons), Buffett will sell. Using this > technique, he has almost always made money. > What's happened to this conflict today? The > efficient market hypothesis is still > dominant among financial and economic > circles. Yet, on the other hand, Buffett is > (at present valuation) the second richest > person in the USA (behind Bill Gates). As > long as the efficient market hypothesis > still dominates thinking in financial > circles, you can make a LOT of money using > Warren Buffett's stock market investing > techniques. > - Dien Rice Personal Development 24/7! ![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Other recent posts on the forum...
Get the report on Harvey Brody's Answers to a Question-Oriented-Person